We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Alan F. Estevez
U.S. BIS export controls chief
I announced during my testimony in July before both the Senate and the House that I was doing a China review. This is part of that China review. [...] So we are going to continue to look at not just what we did in semiconductors, but areas that the Chinese are using to threaten the United States and its allies. And we will continue that kind of work. Obviously semiconductors at the tip of the spear of tech needed for just about everything. And the rule we put out, I'll briefly summarize what's in that. I think most of you have already written about it, and I've heard ad nauseum briefings from us what's in it, but puts restrictions on highest end chips for artificial intelligence and for super computers. We invoke the foreign direct product rule on that, which is an executorial regulation that says, if this is made with US... If whatever the product is made with US technology or US software, you also cannot export that to the restricted place, which essentially means that a Chinese designed chip that they expected to be fabbed at TSMC cannot be fabbed at TSMC and sold back. So it's pretty stringent restrictions on the highest end chips. [...] So we work with our multilateral allies in doing that. I know there's going to be some questions about where's the multilateral and what we just did. And I will say that's a work in progress. We moved out at this point because we felt we needed to for the national security reasons. We were talking to our allies. No one was surprised when we did this, and they all know that we're expecting them to cover likewise, and we're working those details with the specific allies around that.AI Verified source (Oct 27, 2022)
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
Relevant: in the source context, Estevez explains U.S. restrictions on highest-end AI chips to China and says the U.S. is working with multilateral allies, expects them to 'cover likewise,' and expects a multilateral deal. That is directly about coordinating export controls on AI chips to China and makes a supportive stance substantially more likely. ([cnas.org](https://www.cnas.org/publications/transcript/a-conversation-with-under-secretary-of-commerce-alan-f-estevez))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 1d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The author is supportive: he says the rule restricts "highest end chips for artificial intelligence" to China, that "we work with our multilateral allies," and that allies are expected "to cover likewise." In the source Q&A he also says he expects "to have a multilateral deal done," which strongly implies support for democracies coordinating such export controls.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 1d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
The quote is authentic. The CNAS transcript dated October 27, 2022 contains the quoted wording verbatim in Alan Estevez’s opening remarks: the first segment appears at line 274, the semiconductor passage at lines 276–278, and the multilateral-allies passage at line 301; the submitter’s [...] marks accurately omit intervening transcript text. The page title and Commerce biography identify him as Alan F. Estevez, so the attribution, date, and source URL are correct. ([cnas.org](https://www.cnas.org/publications/transcript/a-conversation-with-under-secretary-of-commerce-alan-f-estevez))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 1d ago
replying to Alan F. Estevez