We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Jeff Jarvis
Journalism professor and media commentator
I can go to the machine, and I can have it write a horrible poem, as the Senator said, about anyone that's bad. Is that my fault, or is that the machine's fault? I think that the question becomes-- you're going to find newspapers and TV stations that are going to be using Generative AI in all kinds of ways themselves. You're going to find their contributors are going to be using it. I think it's very difficult to try to pin liability. I went to a World Economic Forum event on AI governance, and the argument there was that we shouldn't pin liability at the model level, but at the application level because that's where people will interact with it, or I would also say at the user level. If I make it do something terrible, then I'm the one who should be liable. [...] In this case, in your example, if Meta created something, then they're liable. However, if someone used a tool, whether that is Adobe or whether that is ChatGPT, to create something and put it on Meta, I don't think Meta should be liable. The person who created it should be.AI Verified source (2024)
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history
AI Verified
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote directly discusses who should be liable for harms from generative AI outputs and explicitly argues against assigning liability at the model/company level, favoring application- or user-level liability instead. That is a clear position on the full statement.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 6d ago
Vote inference verification history
AI Verified
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly rejects blanket model-level company liability: "we shouldn't pin liability at the model level," and "if someone used ... ChatGPT ... to create something ... I don't think Meta should be liable. The person who created it should be."
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 6d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Quote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Verified. The Congress.gov transcript for the Senate Judiciary hearing "Oversight of A.I.: The Future of Journalism" dated January 10, 2024 identifies "Professor Jeff Jarvis" as a witness, and lines 1953-1966 and 1979-1983 contain the quoted language verbatim; the user's [...] is a faithful omission of intervening text. ([congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/event/118th-congress/senate-event/LC73543/text))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 6d ago
replying to Jeff Jarvis