We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by US Policy Team
Future of Life Institute policy team
The Roadmap emphasizes the need to “hold AI developers and deployers accountable if their products or actions cause harm to consumers.” We agree that developers, deployers, and users should all be expected to behave responsibly in the creation, deployment, and use of AI systems, and emphasize that the imposition of liability on developers is particularly critical in order to encourage early design choices that prioritize the safety and wellbeing of the public. The Roadmap also correctly points out that “the rapid evolution of technology and the varying degrees of autonomy in AI products present difficulties in assigning legal liability to AI companies and their users.” Under current law, it is unclear who is responsible when an AI system causes harm, particularly given the complexity of the AI supply chain. Shielding the developers and operators of advanced AI systems from liability for harms resulting from their products would provide little incentive for responsible design that minimizes risk, and, as we have seen with social media, could result in wildly misaligned incentives to the detriment of the American public. [...] Congress should clarify that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act does not shield AI providers from liability for harms resulting from their systems, even if the output was generated in response to a prompt provided by a user.AI Verified source (Jun 17, 2024)
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history
AI Verified
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly supports the full statement: it explicitly says developers and deployers should be held accountable when AI systems cause harm, calls liability on developers 'particularly critical,' and urges Congress not to shield AI providers from liability for harms resulting from their systems.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 3d ago
Vote inference verification history
AI Verified
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly supports liability: it says developers and deployers should be "accountable if their products or actions cause harm," that "the imposition of liability on developers is particularly critical," and that AI providers should not be "shield[ed] ... from liability for harms resulting from their systems."
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 3d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Verification History
AI Verified
Verified: the source URL page lists Author(s) “US Policy Team” and Date published “17 June, 2024,” and the quoted passages appear verbatim on that page in the Liability/Section 230 section. The ellipsis is a valid omission of intervening text between the sentence ending “the detriment of the American public.” and the recommendation beginning “Congress should clarify...”. ([futureoflife.org](https://futureoflife.org/document/vision-into-action-senate-ai-roadmap/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 3d ago
Disputed
The quoted text does appear verbatim (allowing the omitted intervening text marked by [...]) on the linked Future of Life Institute page/PDF, including the Section 230 sentence. However, the source itself credits the document’s author as “US Policy Team” and Future of Life Institute as the publisher, so attributing the quote to “Future of Life Institute” is not an exact author match. ([futureoflife.org](https://futureoflife.org/document/vision-into-action-senate-ai-roadmap/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 6d ago
replying to US Policy Team