Comment by Electronic Frontier Foundation

We're a nonprofit that fights for your privacy and free speech online.
For example, the bill includes a safe harbor scheme modeled on the DMCA notice and takedown process. But the DMCA process has been abused for decades to target lawful speech, and there’s every reason to suppose NO FAKES will lead to the same result. In order to stay within safe harbors, when a platform receives a takedown notice for an alleged digital replica, it must remove “all instances” of that unlawful content. That requirement will inevitably lead to content “filters” that will censor lawful speech. [...] NO FAKES is also a major government overreach. A person’s name and likeness are facts, and the Constitution forbids Congress from granting a property right in those facts. Deceptive, AI-generated replicas can cause real harm, and performers have a right to fair compensation for the use of their likenesses, should they choose to allow that use. But the costs of this bill far outweigh the benefits. [...] The Senate should throw it out and start over.
AI Verified source (2026)
Like Share on X 4mo ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Verified: the supplied official EFF Action Center page contains the quoted text verbatim with allowable omissions. The safe-harbor passage appears in the page’s “Learn More” text, the “NO FAKES is also a major government overreach...” paragraph appears later on the same page, and “The Senate should throw it out and start over” appears in the page’s sample message. Because this is an official EFF page, attribution to Electronic Frontier Foundation is appropriate; an official EFF Deeplinks post dated June 9, 2026 links to this action page, which is consistent with the stored year 2026. ([act.eff.org](https://act.eff.org/action/tell-congress-just-say-no-to-no-fakes)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 16d ago
Disputed Disputed: EFF does publish very similar language on its 2026 NO FAKES action pages, but I could not confirm this as one real verbatim quote. The source URL contains the DMCA/safe-harbor passage and the constitutional-overreach sentence, but its ending instead includes an extra clause about performers having a right to fair compensation; the sentence “The Senate should throw it out and start over” appears separately in the sample message, not as part of the same continuous passage. So the submitted text is a stitched/altered composite rather than an exact quotation. ([act.eff.org](https://act.eff.org/action/tell-congress-just-say-no-to-no-fakes)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 18d ago
replying to Electronic Frontier Foundation