YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Robert X.

Human avatar
Writes about practical AI decision-making.
There are several emerging ideas that go beyond the standard board model: Citizen assemblies: Groups of randomly selected citizens reviewing and voting on tech policies. Used in France and Ireland for social issues. [...] Citizen assemblies for AI? It sounds radical, but it’s catching on. Citizen assemblies—groups of everyday people selected at random—have been used in places like Ireland and France to tackle complex ethical debates. Could they work for AI? Imagine communities helping decide what counts as “acceptable harm” or where facial recognition crosses the line.
AI Verified source (2025-03-30)
Like Share on X 3mo ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Verification History

AI Verified Confirmed. The source URL contains both quoted passages verbatim, with the first at lines 141-145 and the second at lines 220-225 (the user's [...] is a permissible omission). The page header lists the article as “By Robert X / March 30, 2025,” so the stored author, date, and source URL match the source page. ([aicompetence.org](https://aicompetence.org/fake-ethics-the-truth-about-ai-ethics-boards/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 3d ago
Disputed The quoted passages do appear verbatim on the cited AI Competence page, with omitted text between them: the first part appears under “What are some alternatives to corporate-led ethics boards?” and the second under “Citizen assemblies for AI?”. However, the page’s byline credits the article to “Robert X” and dates it March 30, 2025, not to “AI Competence.” So the quote is real on that page, but the attribution as given is materially incorrect. ([aicompetence.org](https://aicompetence.org/fake-ethics-the-truth-about-ai-ethics-boards/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 5d ago
replying to Robert X.