We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Juan Luis Pedreño Molina
Spanish deputy (PP)
Members of the Socialist Party, theoretically today you come to tell us that artificial intelligence must be regulated, and you associate it with the most vulnerable people. [...] Look: what you propose already exists. The Artificial Intelligence Act in Europe—and therefore in Spain, because it is directly applicable—already exists. The international AI regulatory office—which you also ask for—also exists; it is called the European AI Office. But if you want to talk about vulnerable people—about how to help them and how to protect them with the implementation of artificial intelligence—then, listen, read the law. There are many articles in the law that set out obligations for artificial intelligence systems directly related to vulnerable people. [...] It is unacceptable; it is a disgrace that you use the term “vulnerable people” to include a purely ideological proposition, because vulnerable people do not deserve it. [...] To finish: this non-legislative motion is a deception—an attempt by the Socialist Group to use artificial intelligence to advance the ideological program of an exhausted government. Therefore, with proposals like this, do not ask us to be your accomplices.AI Verified source (2024)
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history
AI Verified
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote directly addresses the full proposal: regulating artificial intelligence and linking that regulation to protecting vulnerable people. It explicitly says the speakers 'come to tell us that artificial intelligence must be regulated' and 'associate it with the most vulnerable people,' then rejects the motion as unnecessary and ideological.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 20h ago
Vote inference verification history
AI Unverifiable
Vote answer comments
AI Unverifiable
The speaker attacks the proposal as redundant and ideological—"what you propose already exists" and "this non-legislative motion is a deception"—but also says existing AI law already protects vulnerable people, so the quote does not clearly oppose the general idea of regulating AI to protect them.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 20h ago
Quote authenticity verification history
AI Verified
The official June 11, 2024 Congreso transcript identifies the speaker as “El señor PEDREÑO MOLINA” and contains the corresponding Spanish passages from his speech, including “Teóricamente, hoy vienen a decirnos...” and the ending “no nos pidan que seamos sus cómplices.” The provided English is a faithful translation with omissions/condensation, and the source URL itself contains the text. ([congreso.es](https://www.congreso.es/public_oficiales/L15/CONG/DS/PL/DSCD-15-PL-46.PDF))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 20h ago
AI Unverifiable
Could not verify the specific quote. The source_url is the official Spanish Congress plenary Diario de Sesiones PDF (DSCD-15-PL-46), which returns HTTP 403 to WebFetch and whose interior text is not indexed by search engines, so I could not obtain the verbatim passage. Corroborating facts that DO check out: Juan Luis Pedreño Molina is a real PP deputy and the party's spokesperson on Digital Transformation/AI in Congress (correct attribution); the PSOE non-legislative motion "Regular la Inteligencia Artificial para proteger a los más vulnerables" (matching statement 409) is genuine and was debated/approved in June 2024; and PP opposing that PSOE motion is consistent with the "against" vote and with PP's documented criticism of the government on AI. The quote text reads as an authentic plenary intervention and is internally consistent with the "against" vote, but because the source is inaccessible and the exact wording cannot be independently confirmed, I am marking ai_unverifiable rather than verified. Year 2024 is correct.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 2d ago
replying to Juan Luis Pedreño Molina