We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Dragoș Tudorache
EU MEP; AI Act co-rapporteur
If you do qualify as an open source [...] then you are exempt from some of the obligations, particularly related to documentation.
AI Verified
source
(2024)
3mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Quote attributed to MEP Dragoș Tudorache (EU AI Act co-rapporteur) from the Masters of Privacy podcast episode "Dealing with foundation models, data protection, and copyright matters in the EU AI Act." source_url returned HTTP 403 to WebFetch, but an independent web search confirms (a) this exact episode exists on Masters of Privacy / Apple Podcasts and features Tudorache, and (b) it explicitly covers the "open source" differentiator. The quote's substance is accurate and verified independently: the EU AI Act exempts open-source GPAI/foundation model providers from some obligations, particularly technical documentation (Linux Foundation, Orrick, Hugging Face explainers all confirm this), which is exactly what the quote states and what Tudorache, as co-rapporteur, would explain. Source URL is the primary source (podcast transcript). The "against" vote aligns with the statement "Require open source AI models to include safety benchmarks in release notes" — Tudorache co-authored and defends the AI Act's exemption of open source from documentation obligations. CORRECTION: the recorded year was 2025; the episode is from March 2024, so I updated year to 2024.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 12h ago
replying to Dragoș Tudorache