We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Richard Sill
Reason Foundation technology policy fellow
But HB 145 seeks to criminalize AI content based on subjectively defined terms such as election-related “deepfakes.”AI Verified source (2026)
Quote authenticity verification history
Verification History
AI Verified
The Reason Foundation page at the cited URL is a February 4, 2026 testimony credited to Richard Sill, and its body text contains the quoted sentence verbatim. The page identifies Sill as the author, so the quote is correctly attributed. ([reason.org](https://reason.org/testimony/marylands-proposed-deepfake-criminalization-threatens-the-first-amendment/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 5d ago
AI Verified
Quote attributed to Richard Sill, Technology Policy Fellow at the Reason Foundation (2026), from testimony "Maryland's Proposed Deepfake Criminalization Threatens the First Amendment" on reason.org. source_url returned HTTP 403 to WebFetch, but an independent web search confirms the verbatim argument ("HB 145 seeks to criminalize AI content based on subjectively defined terms such as election-related 'deepfakes'") attributed to Richard Sill of Reason Foundation in testimony submitted ~Feb 4, 2026 to the Maryland House committee opposing HB 145, corroborated by coverage (CrispNG, El-Balad). Source URL is the primary source. Year 2026 is correct and recent. The "against" vote correctly aligns with the statement on criminalizing electoral deepfakes — Sill/Reason oppose criminalization on First Amendment grounds, recommending a disclosure-based approach instead.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 7d ago
replying to Richard Sill