We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Carl Szabo
NetChoice VP & General Counsel
It will result in the chilling and blocking of constitutionally protected free speech.AI Verified source (2024)
3mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history
AI Unverifiable
Statement relation comments
AI Unverifiable
The quote is a generic free-speech objection and does not mention deepfakes, AI, criminalization, or electoral campaigns. There is not enough evidence to tell that it is specifically about the full policy statement.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 5d ago
Vote inference verification history
Unverified
No vote answer verification comments yet.
Quote authenticity verification history
Verification History
AI Verified
The quote is authentic. The original Los Angeles Times article published on Aug. 31, 2024 contains the exact sentence and attributes it to Carl Szabo: “It will result in the chilling and blocking of constitutionally protected free speech,” said Carl Szabo, vice president and general counsel for NetChoice. A search result for the Seattle Times URL shows the same wording and attribution in the syndicated version. ([latimes.com](https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-08-31/california-is-racing-to-combat-deepfakes-ahead-of-the-election))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 5d ago
AI Verified
Quote: "It will result in the chilling and blocking of constitutionally protected free speech." — Carl Szabo, NetChoice VP & General Counsel, 2024.
Checks performed:
- WebFetch is blocked globally here (HTTP 403 all URLs), so corroborated via WebSearch. Confirmed: the Seattle Times article ("California is racing to combat deepfakes ahead of the election", the cited source_url) quotes Carl Szabo, NetChoice VP & general counsel, saying exactly "It will result in the chilling and blocking of constitutionally protected free speech" about California's deepfake election law. NetChoice (members include Google, X, Meta, Snap) litigated against these laws; a federal judge later struck one down on First Amendment grounds.
- Author attribution: Correct — Carl Szabo, NetChoice VP & General Counsel.
- Year: 2024, correct (California deepfake laws / litigation, Sept–Oct 2024). Older but relevant; KEPT. No genuine sourced 2026 quote located to add; not fabricating.
- Source: seattletimes.com matches and contains the quote.
- Relevance: Highly relevant to "Criminalizing deepfakes and malicious use of AI in electoral campaigns."
- Vote alignment: Vote "against" correct — Szabo/NetChoice oppose criminalizing/restricting electoral deepfakes, arguing it chills protected speech.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 8d ago
replying to Carl Szabo