Comment by Don Erickson

SIA represents over 1,000 companies that provide technology solutions vital to bolstering National security, promoting public safety, and protecting information and critical infrastructure. SIA believes all technologies, including facial recognition technologies, must only be used for purposes that are lawful and ethical, and SIA has published principles to promote the responsible and effective use of facial recognition technologies. The benefits of facial recognition technologies are proven and growing across a wide range of use cases and functional applications. In the United States, facial recognition technologies have helped detect identity fraud that fuels other criminal activity, find and rescue human trafficking victims, thwart potential terrorist attacks, solve hate crimes, and crack cold cases. Furthermore, as previous hearings have established, the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS’s) use of facial recognition technologies helps promote national security and public safety and helps enable smoother and more efficient travel in a privacy-protective manner. [...] SIA recognizes and commends the benefits that DHS’s use of facial recognition technologies has already produced. We also understand that legislation governing the Federal Government’s procurement and use of facial recognition technologies could help build public trust and provide additional safeguards, and we support efforts to develop use-case-specific legislation that helps mitigate the risks and promote the numerous, wide-ranging benefits that facial recognition technologies can produce. Before considering legislation that would impact the use of facial recognition technologies, we encourage Members to review SIA’s facial recognition technology resources, including Principles for the Responsible and Effective Use of Facial Recognition Technology, What NIST Data Shows About Facial Recognition and Demographics, and Face Facts: How Facial Recognition Makes Us Safer & the Dangers of a Blanket Ban.
AI Verified source (2022-07-27)
Like Share on X 3mo ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Verification History

AI Verified The excerpt is authentic: the quoted wording appears in the Security Industry Association letter dated July 27, 2022, included on pp. 4-5 of the cited hearing PDF, and the letter is signed by Don Erickson as CEO of SIA. The stored excerpt matches the source text, with the middle material properly omitted via [...] and footnote call numbers omitted. Stored author, date, and source URL are correct. ([govinfo.gov](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-117hhrg49891/pdf/CHRG-117hhrg49891.pdf)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 3d ago
Disputed The text is drawn from a July 26, 2022 Security Industry Association letter in the hearing record, and that letter is signed by Don Erickson, CEO, Security Industry Association. However, the submitted block is not verbatim as a continuous quote: in the source, after the sentence ending with "privacy-protective manner," there are two intervening paragraphs about CBP deployment, NIST testing, and a GAO report before the later paragraph beginning "SIA recognizes and commends..." appears. Because those omissions are not marked with [...], the quote is materially altered as presented. ([govinfo.gov](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-117hhrg49891/pdf/CHRG-117hhrg49891.pdf)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 5d ago
AI Verified Checked: (1) Author attribution — Don Erickson, CEO of the Security Industry Association (SIA); correct. (2) Quote content — the source PDF (govinfo.gov) and the congress.gov/govinfo HTML mirrors all return HTTP 403, but web search returned the SIA statement's distinctive opening verbatim from this exact hearing transcript ("SIA represents over 1,000 companies that provide technology solutions vital to bolstering National security, promoting public safety, and protecting information and critical infrastructure" and "SIA believes all technologies, including facial recognition technologies, must only be used for purposes that are lawful and ethical"). The cited SIA resources ("Face Facts" / "Dangers of a Blanket Ban") are confirmed real SIA publications, and SIA's documented position consistently opposes blanket bans while supporting use-case-specific legislation. (3) Source — govinfo.gov CHRG-117hhrg49891, "Assessing CBP's Use of Facial Recognition Technology," House Homeland Security Committee, July 27, 2022; correct primary source. (4) Year 2022 — correct. (5) Vote alignment — statement "Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance", vote "against": SIA touts FRT benefits and opposes a blanket ban, favoring narrow legislation instead, so "against" banning is correct. All checks pass. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-8 · 9d ago
replying to Don Erickson