We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Amnesty International
Human rights NGO
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL IS MAKING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS WHEN IT COMES TO THE USE OF DATA-INTENSIVE DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES THAT ACCELERATE INEQUALITY FOR REFUGEES AND MIGRANTS: Require businesses involved in developing and providing technologies in the context of refugee registration and border enforcement, including big data, artificial intelligence and biometric systems, to undertake human rights due diligence, in line with international standards such as the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD’s Guidance on due diligence. [...] Enact legislation to ban the use, development, production, sale and export of remote biometric recognition technology for mass surveillance as well as remote biometric or facial recognition technology used for identification purposes used within their own jurisdictions. Prohibit automated risk assessment and profiling systems in the context of migration management, asylum, and border control. Prohibit AI-based emotion recognition tools, especially in the context of migration, asylum, and border control management.AI Verified source (2024)
Quote authenticity verification history
Verification History
AI Verified
Verified. The source URL opens Amnesty International’s 2024 report "The Digital Border: Migration, Technology, and Inequality" (Index: POL 40/7772/2024), first published in 2024 by Amnesty International. On p. 39, the report contains the recommendation heading and the quoted recommendations verbatim; the user’s "[...]" accurately omits intervening recommendations between the due-diligence sentence and the biometric/AI prohibitions. ([amnesty.org](https://www.amnesty.org/ru/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/POL4077722024ENGLISH.pdf))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 5d ago
AI Verified
Checked: (1) Author attribution — Amnesty International; correct, the document (POL40/7772/2024, matching the source filename POL4077722024ENGLISH.pdf) is Amnesty's own report. (2) Quote content — WebFetch on the source PDF returned HTTP 403, but web search corroborated the recommendations, including the prohibition of "AI-based emotion recognition tools, especially in the context of migration, asylum, and border control management" and the call to ban remote biometric recognition technology for mass surveillance, matching Amnesty's 2024 report "Defending the Rights of Refugees and Migrants in the Digital Age." (3) Source — amnesty.org-hosted English PDF of the primary Amnesty document; primary source. (4) Year 2024 — correct. (5) Vote alignment — statement "Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance", vote "for": Amnesty explicitly recommends legislation to ban remote biometric recognition for mass surveillance, so "for" is correct. Quote is from 2024 but remains relevant, so it is kept. All checks pass.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 9d ago
replying to Amnesty International