We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Silkie Carlo
Director of Big Brother Watch
I agree very strongly with those points. There is also a case for a central register or inventory of all public sector algorithms so that we can at least surface where they are being used. If they had equality impact assessments as well, that would be fantastic. I strongly feel that the committee should recommend that the use of live facial recognition overtly in public spaces is prohibited. The European Parliament has just called for that. In the US, a number of facial recognition algorithms were paused for law enforcement use. This is now becoming an international standard. We have set a very bad example over the past few years, and we are grappling with major trust issues with policing. [...] That is why an urgent legislative prohibition on the use of facial recognition, as we see being called for in Europe, is essential. Then, if people think there is a future for the technology, they can make the case, but right now all we see are very serious problems and risks.AI Verified source (2021-10-12)
Quote authenticity verification history
Verification History
AI Verified
The official UK Parliament transcript for Tuesday 12 October 2021 names Silkie Carlo as the speaker and contains the quoted passages verbatim at lines 312-313 and 318, with the omitted text matching the intervening lines 314-317; the stored author, date, and source URL are correct. ([committees.parliament.uk](https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/2820/html/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 3d ago
Disputed
The official UK Parliament transcript for the 12 October 2021 session does attribute these statements to Silkie Carlo, and the first two paragraphs and the last paragraph appear at lines 312-313 and 318 of the source. However, the submitted quote is not verbatim as presented: it skips substantial intervening text at lines 314-317 without marking the omission (for example with [...]). ([committees.parliament.uk](https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/2820/html/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 5d ago
AI Unverifiable
Could not positively verify the exact quote. The source URL (committees.parliament.uk oral-evidence transcript 2820, an official UK Parliament record) returned HTTP 403 to direct fetch, and I could not locate the verbatim transcript text via web search. CORROBORATION is strong but indirect: the quote's content matches Silkie Carlo's (Director, Big Brother Watch) well-documented positions — calling for a public/central register of public-sector algorithms, equality impact assessments, and a legislative prohibition on overt live facial recognition in public spaces. The contextual references also fit a 2021 date (the European Parliament's October 2021 resolution calling for a ban on facial recognition in public spaces; the 2020–2021 US pauses of facial recognition for law enforcement). The "for" vote on statement #412 ("Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance") clearly aligns with her stance, and year 2021 appears correct. However, because the source is unfetchable and I have no independent verbatim confirmation that this exact passage appears in transcript 2820, I am marking ai_unverifiable rather than verified, to stay conservative. No content/year/source changes made as they appear correct.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 9d ago
replying to Silkie Carlo