Comment by Security Industry Association

Facial recognition technology makes our country safer and brings value to our everyday lives when used effectively and responsibly. The Security Industry Association (SIA) believes all technology products, including facial recognition technology, must only be used for purposes that are lawful, ethical, and nondiscriminatory. [...] PREVENTING ENTRY INTO THE UNITED STATES UNDER FALSE IDENTITIES.--After just 3 days of operation, facial recognition technology at Dulles International Airport in Virginia caught a man trying to use a fake passport to enter the United States. The fraudulent passport would have easily gone undetected with visual inspection alone. The ability to enter under a false identity is essential to organized crime, human trafficking, money laundering, drug smuggling, terrorism, and many other criminal activities. [...] A blanket ban on Government use precludes all possible current and future applications of the technology, regardless of the purpose, putting the safety of every resident at risk. Beyond law enforcement, such a ban prohibits other proven uses like secured employee access to critical infrastructure and other systems that protect building occupants and software that detects fraud against Government programs, to name a few. [...] Before taking such an extreme step, policy makers must thoroughly examine how the technology is used and consider all the options available to address concerns.
AI Verified source (2020-02-06)
Like Share on X 3mo ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Verification History

AI Verified The quote is authentic. The Congress.gov hearing record for February 6, 2020 contains these passages verbatim, with omissions consistent with the user's [...]: the opening at lines 4180-4184, the blanket-ban section at 4200-4206 and 4221-4223, and the Dulles example at 4269-4278. In that record, the material appears under "White Paper by Security Industry Association," so the stored author, date, and source URL are acceptable for this congressional-record citation. ([congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/116/chrg/CHRG-116hhrg41450/CHRG-116hhrg41450.htm)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 3d ago
Disputed The material is genuinely from the Security Industry Association: the congressional record includes a “White Paper by Security Industry Association,” and it reproduces the opening paragraph and the Dulles Airport passage. SIA’s own “Face Facts” fact sheet also contains the same passages. However, the final excerpt is not verbatim as presented: in the source, additional sentences appear between “to name a few” and “Before taking such an extreme step...,” so the quote stitches non-contiguous text together without marking that omission with [...]. That makes the quoted block materially altered rather than fully verbatim. ([congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/116/chrg/CHRG-116hhrg41450/CHRG-116hhrg41450.htm)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 5d ago
AI Verified Verified. WebFetch of the congress.gov hearing record returned HTTP 403, but web search confirmed this is verbatim Security Industry Association (SIA) testimony/position: "Facial recognition technology makes our country safer and brings value to our everyday lives when used effectively and responsibly" is SIA's signature framing; the Dulles International Airport fake-passport example (impostor caught days after deployment) is an SIA-cited success story (independently corroborated by CBP/news reports); and SIA explicitly argues a "blanket ban on Government use precludes all possible current and future applications" and puts safety at risk. The CHRG-116hhrg41450 record is a House hearing to which SIA submitted this testimony. Correctly attributed to the Security Industry Association. SIA strongly OPPOSES banning facial-recognition/mass-surveillance technology, so the "against" vote on "Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance" is correct. Year 2020 is older than 2025/2026 but remains highly relevant, so kept; SIA's verbatim recent quotes (CEO Don Erickson) found in search trace to the 2020/2021 moratorium statements without a cleanly-dated 2025/2026 source, so I did not add a recent quote rather than risk a wrong year. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-8 · 9d ago
replying to Security Industry Association