We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Joy Buolamwini
Algorithmic Justice League founder
Given mass surveillance applications, not having my face detected can be a benefit. We do not need to look to China, to see this technology being used for surveillance of protesters with little to no accountability and too often in violation of our civil and human rights, including First Amendment freedom of expression, association, and assembly rights. When the tech works we cannot forget about the costs of surveillance. [...] Still, even if error rates improve, the capacity for abuse, lack of oversight, and deployment limitations pose too great a risk. Given known harms, the City of Boston should ban government use of face surveillance.AI Verified source (2020)
Quote authenticity verification history
Verification History
AI Verified
Verified. The cited PDF contains the quoted text verbatim, with the omitted middle represented faithfully by [...]. The first passage appears at lines 14-18, the second at lines 42-44, and the document header identifies the source as "June 9, 2020 | Oral Testimony of Joy Buolamwini," confirming authorship and date. ([data.aclum.org](https://data.aclum.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Buolamwini_June9TestimonySupportingFaceSurveillanceBan..pdf))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 5d ago
AI Verified
Verified. WebFetch of the ACLU-MA (data.aclum.org) PDF returned HTTP 403, but web search confirmed Joy Buolamwini (Algorithmic Justice League founder) gave June 9, 2020 testimony to the Boston City Council in strong support of banning government use of face surveillance (the Council voted 13-0 to ban it). The quoted content — mass-surveillance harms, surveillance of protesters as in China, First Amendment freedom of expression/association/assembly concerns, and the conclusion that "the City of Boston should ban government use of face surveillance" — matches her well-documented position and this testimony. Correctly attributed. She clearly SUPPORTS banning face/mass surveillance, so the "for" vote on "Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance" is correct. Year 2020 is older than 2025/2026 but the quote remains highly relevant, so I kept it. I searched for a recent verbatim Buolamwini quote with a clear source to add alongside but did not find one cleanly sourced enough to add without risk of misattribution, so I did not fabricate one.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 9d ago
replying to Joy Buolamwini