Comment by Ashley Gorski

ACLU National Security Project attorney
Unlike other ways of verifying a person’s identity, face recognition technology can enable persistent government surveillance on a massive scale. The public has a right to know when, where, and how the government is using face recognition, and what safeguards, if any, are in place to protect our rights. This unregulated surveillance technology threatens to fundamentally alter our free society and is in urgent need of democratic oversight. [...] That we even need to go to court to pry out this information further demonstrates why we should be wary of weak industry proposals and why lawmakers urgently need to halt law and immigration enforcement use of this technology. There can be no meaningful oversight or accountability with such excessive, undemocratic secrecy.
AI Verified source (2020)
Like Share on X 3mo ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Verification History

AI Verified Verified. The ACLU press release "ACLU Challenges DHS Face Recognition Secrecy," dated March 12, 2020, contains the exact first passage attributed to “Ashley Gorski, staff attorney with the ACLU’s National Security Project,” and later the exact second passage attributed to Gorski. The user’s quote matches verbatim, with [...] accurately indicating omitted intervening text. ([aclu.org](https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/aclu-challenges-dhs-face-recognition-secrecy)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 5d ago
AI Verified Quote by Ashley Gorski (ACLU National Security Project staff attorney) stating that face recognition can enable "persistent government surveillance on a massive scale," that the public has a right to know how it is used, that this "unregulated surveillance technology threatens to fundamentally alter our free society," and calling on lawmakers to halt law- and immigration-enforcement use. Source is the ACLU press release "ACLU Challenges DHS Face Recognition Secrecy." The aclu.org URL returned HTTP 403 to direct WebFetch, but web search confirmed the quote VERBATIM (multiple lines matched exactly) and the context: the ACLU/NYCLU March 2020 FOIA lawsuit against DHS, CBP, ICE and TSA over secret facial-recognition use, with Gorski quoted exactly as stored. Author attribution correct (and the bio "ACLU National Security Project attorney" is accurate); year 2020 accurate; quote relevant. Vote alignment: linked statement is "Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance"; Gorski warns against mass face-surveillance and urges halting its enforcement use, so the "for" vote is correct. Quote is from 2020 and was kept as still relevant. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-8 · 10d ago
replying to Ashley Gorski