Comment by Dr. Nina Scheer

I reject large-scale facial recognition, for example at railway stations and airports. The possibilities for totalitarian surveillance are out of proportion to the benefits for fighting crime.
AI Verified source (2021)
Like Share on X 3mo ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Verification History

AI Verified The source URL contains a response dated August 9, 2021, explicitly attributed to Nina Scheer. In German, she says she rejects large-scale facial recognition at railway stations and airports and that the possibilities for totalitarian surveillance are disproportionate to the benefits for fighting crime. Your English version is a faithful, slightly condensed translation of that passage. ([abgeordnetenwatch.de](https://www.abgeordnetenwatch.de/profile/nina-scheer/fragen-antworten/wie-stehen-sie-zu-automatischer-gesichtserkennung-im-oeffentlichen-raum-und-wie-werden-sie-abstimmen-wenn-die)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 5d ago
AI Verified Quote by Dr. Nina Scheer (German Bundestag MP, SPD) rejecting large-scale facial recognition at railway stations and airports because the potential for totalitarian surveillance is out of proportion to crime-fighting benefits. The source URL (abgeordnetenwatch.de) returned HTTP 403 to direct fetch, but web search confirmed the page content matches the quote precisely: it is her answer on abgeordnetenwatch.de dated August 9, 2021, where she rejects widespread facial recognition at train stations/airports citing disproportionate totalitarian-surveillance risks. The English text is an accurate translation of the German original. Quote is genuine and correctly attributed; year 2021 is accurate. Vote alignment: linked statement is "Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance"; Scheer opposes large-scale biometric surveillance, so the "for" vote (in favor of a ban) is correct. Quote is relevant to the AI-surveillance dataset and was kept. This is a 2021 quote; I searched for a recent (2025/26) Scheer statement on this specific topic but found none clearly for/against, so I kept the existing quote without adding one. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-8 · 10d ago
replying to Dr. Nina Scheer