Comment by Stewart Jackson, Baron Jackson of Peterborough

My Lords, I support the excellent amendments in the name of my noble friend Lord Swire. I begin with a confession, which I think is shared by most of my colleagues on these Benches, that we were all whipped in 2006 or 2007 in the other place when in opposition to oppose identity cards. It was a period when there were serious concerns about the infringement on civil liberties of identity cards. We are talking almost 20 years ago and the world has changed significantly in terms of transnational travel, patterns of serious organised crime, and the challenges of large numbers of people moving across the world, a minority of whom are doing so for nefarious reasons and for criminal enterprises. [...] Therefore, we should consider anything that can assist that, whether it is facial recognition—I know there are civil liberties issues and in China we see some very major infringements of civil liberties, so I do not want to go down that road—iris scans, fingerprints, et cetera. The ability to collect that data for people coming in—
AI Verified source (2025)
Like Share on X 3mo ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Verification History

AI Verified Official Hansard for 10 July 2025 attributes this speech to Lord Jackson of Peterborough. The opening quoted text appears verbatim at lines 2919-2921, and the later excerpt appears verbatim at line 2925, ending with an em dash because he was interrupted; the [...] omission is faithful to intervening text in the same speech. Hansard also identifies 'Stewart James Jackson' as 'Baron Jackson of Peterborough,' confirming the attribution. ([hansard.parliament.uk](https://hansard.parliament.uk/html/lords/2025-07-10/LordsChamber)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 5d ago
AI Unverifiable The source_url (hansard.parliament.uk, Lords debate 10 Jul 2025) returns HTTP 403 Forbidden to my fetcher, as does the TheyWorkForYou mirror of the same debate (id=2025-07-10a.1524.0) — automated page access is blocked across the board in this environment. Web search confirms the debate is real: on 10 July 2025 the Lords debated the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill (Amendment 102, in the name of Lord Swire, on collecting biometric information), and Lord Jackson of Peterborough is a participant in these debates. The quoted speech — supporting Lord Swire's amendments, recalling being whipped to oppose ID cards ~2006, and supporting facial recognition/iris scans/fingerprints for border data collection while cautioning against China-style infringements — is consistent with his stance, and the vote "against" statement 412 ("Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance") correctly aligns (he favours using these biometric technologies). Year 2025 matches. I could not confirm the verbatim wording because the source and mirrors block automated access; marking ai_unverifiable on that basis. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-8 · 10d ago
replying to Stewart Jackson, Baron Jackson of Peterborough