We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Brian E. Finch
Heritage Foundation visiting legal fellow
Facial recognition systems have generated a significant amount of controversy over their potential to create an unblinking, discriminatory surveillance system across the United States. A closer examination reveals that the best-crafted facial recognition systems do not produce results that discriminate against racial, ethnic, or gender groups. Creation of federal standards to push the use of non-discriminatory algorithms by government agencies is a far preferable alternative to a complete ban on the technology.AI Verified source (2020)
Quote authenticity verification history
Verification History
AI Verified
Verified: the Heritage Foundation page for “Addressing Legitimate Concerns About Government Use of Facial Recognition Technologies” lists Brian E. Finch as the author and is dated October 30, 2020. In the page’s Summary section, the three sentences you provided appear verbatim; the source then continues with an additional sentence after the excerpt. ([heritage.org](https://www.heritage.org/civil-rights/report/addressing-legitimate-concerns-about-government-use-facial-recognition))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 5d ago
AI Unverifiable
The source_url (heritage.org report "Addressing Legitimate Concerns About Government Use of Facial Recognition Technologies", Oct 2020) returns HTTP 403 Forbidden to my fetcher. Web search confirms the quote is verbatim accurate and attributed to Brian E. Finch, Visiting Legal Fellow at The Heritage Foundation, including the line "Creation of federal standards to push the use of non-discriminatory algorithms by government agencies is a far preferable alternative to a complete ban on the technology." Year 2020 matches. The vote "against" on statement 412 ("Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance") correctly aligns: Finch explicitly opposes a complete ban, preferring federal standards. This 2020 quote is old but still relevant, so kept. Marking ai_unverifiable only because the source URL blocks automated access; the quote is accurate and correctly attributed.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 10d ago
replying to Brian E. Finch