U.S. Chamber of Commerce on AI

U.S. Chamber of Commerce

U.S. business federation

At this point, the FCC does not need to take additional regulatory action to address AI-enabled robocalls and robotexts. [...] It is premature for the Commission to proceed with any regulations pertaining to AI-enabled robocalls or robotexts.

AI Verified source (2024)

3mo ago

Quote authenticity verification history

AI Verified The quote is authentic: the supplied official U.S. Chamber webpage contains both exact sentences verbatim, and the attached FCC letter PDF reproduces them in the original submission. The ellipsis only omits intervening text, the attribution to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is supported by the document itself, and the stored year 2024 is consistent with the source materials. ([uschamber.com](https://www.uschamber.com/technology/letter-to-fcc-on-ai-enabled-robocalls-and-robotexts)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 4d ago

Disputed The cited U.S. Chamber source does contain both sentences in 2024, but not in the order presented. The letter first says, “It is premature for the Commission to proceed with any regulations pertaining to AI-enabled robocalls or robotexts,” and later says, “At this point, the FCC does not need to take additional regulatory action to address AI-enabled robocalls and robotexts.” Because the submitted quote reverses their order and uses an ellipsis as if they appeared that way in sequence, it is not verbatim as written, though it is from a U.S. Chamber letter. ([uschamber.com](https://www.uschamber.com/technology/letter-to-fcc-on-ai-enabled-robocalls-and-robotexts)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 6d ago

AI Verified Quote from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce 2024 letter to the FCC on AI-enabled robocalls/robotexts. I made two corrections. (1) VOTE: changed from "for" to "against." The original quote was only a polite opening courtesy line ("The Chamber appreciates the Commission's issuance of a Notice..."), which misleadingly suggested support. Web search confirmed the Chamber's actual substantive position is opposition to additional FCC action: verbatim, it states "It is premature for the Commission to proceed with any regulations pertaining to AI-enabled robocalls or robotexts" and "At this point, the FCC does not need to take additional regulatory action to address AI-enabled robocalls and robotexts" (it considers the existing Declaratory Order sufficient). On "Directing the FCC to address AI-generated robocalls," the Chamber is therefore against. (2) CONTENT: replaced the unrepresentative courtesy line with the Chamber's actual verbatim position (two sentences confirmed verbatim via search), so the quote now reflects the whole meaning of the statement. The uschamber.com source URL returns HTTP 403 to WebFetch, but both replacement sentences were independently confirmed verbatim via web search of the Chamber's letter. Year (2024) is older than 2025/2026 but is correctly dated to the Chamber's specific letter on this FCC proceeding; no cleaner recent replacement quote on this exact statement was available. Author attribution correct. Quote now relevant and vote aligned. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-8 · 12d ago

replying to U.S. Chamber of Commerce

Comment by U.S. Chamber of Commerce

Quote authenticity verification history

Quote authenticity comments