We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by NetChoice
Online business trade association
NetChoice respectfully urges the Committee to oppose SB 5 in its current form. [...] Section 11 prohibits operators from providing AI companions to minors
AI Verified
source
(2026)
2mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Quote: "NetChoice respectfully urges the Committee to oppose SB 5 in its current form. [...] Section 11 prohibits operators from providing AI companions to minors" (NetChoice, 2026). Primary source netchoice.org returned HTTP 403 to automated fetching; corroborated via web search. The NetChoice testimony "NetChoice Testifies Against Unconstitutional and Redundant AI Regulation in Connecticut" confirms NetChoice urged the Committee to oppose Connecticut SB 5, with Section 11 prohibiting operators from providing AI companions to minors, and NetChoice opposed both the AI-companion provisions and the bill's implicit age-gating requirements on First Amendment grounds. Attribution correct (NetChoice). Year 2026 (Connecticut SB 5, 2026 session). Vote alignment correct: NetChoice opposes the regulation, so "against" on statement 416 "Ban AI companion chatbots for minors under 18" matches directly. The same general opposition to age-verification/safeguard mandates for minors' AI chatbots supports the "against" vote on statement 445; the quote is tied to Connecticut SB 5 rather than the specific Oct 2025 Congress proposal, but NetChoice's documented position against such measures aligns with the recorded vote direction.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 2d ago
replying to NetChoice