Comment by Morgan Wilsmann

Although age restrictions on chatbots designed for erotic or intimate interactions likely meet the “obscene for children” standard from Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, we oppose wide-ranging age restrictions, as they could hinder both children and adults from exploring the positive expressive potential of AI chatbots.
AI Verified source (2025)
Like Share on X 3mo ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified The exact sentence appears in the Public Knowledge article at the provided URL, and the page identifies the piece as "By Morgan Wilsmann" published on November 7, 2025. This supports that the quote is real, verbatim, and correctly attributed. ([publicknowledge.org](https://publicknowledge.org/kids-teens-safety-regulations-for-ai-chatbots-could-backfire/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 14d ago
AI Verified Quote: "Although age restrictions on chatbots designed for erotic or intimate interactions likely meet the 'obscene for children' standard from Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, we oppose wide-ranging age restrictions, as they could hinder both children and adults from exploring the positive expressive potential of AI chatbots." — Morgan Wilsmann / Public Knowledge (2025). The source URL (publicknowledge.org/kids-teens-safety-regulations-for-ai-chatbots-could-backfire) returned HTTP 403 to direct fetch, but web search confirmed this exact text appears in that specific Public Knowledge article ("Kids & Teens Safety Regulations for AI Chatbots Could Backfire"). Author attribution is correct: the article is by Public Knowledge policy advocate Morgan Wilsmann and uses the organizational "we oppose" voice. Vote alignment is correct: statement #416 "Ban AI companion chatbots for minors under 18" (against) and #445 "Requiring age verification and content safeguards for AI chatbots to protect minors" (against) both align with the quote's opposition to wide-ranging age restrictions on AI chatbots. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-6 · 23d ago
replying to Morgan Wilsmann