YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Megan Garcia

Human avatar
Mother, child online safety advocate
Specifically, I commend this bill for prohibiting harmful AI companions for children that including emotionally manipulative AI such as chatbots...
AI Verified source (2025)
Like Share on X 3mo ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Confirmed. In the April 22, 2025 Digital Democracy hearing transcript, Rebecca Bauer-Kahan says Tracy Frey is "reading the statement" of Megan Garcia; the statement then identifies itself as Megan Garcia’s and ends with "Megan L. Garcia." The quoted text appears in that statement on the source page, with additional words after "chatbots," so the trailing ellipsis is a faithful omission rather than an alteration. ([calmatters.digitaldemocracy.org](https://calmatters.digitaldemocracy.org/hearings/258894)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 14d ago
AI Unverifiable Quote: "Specifically, I commend this bill for prohibiting harmful AI companions for children that including emotionally manipulative AI such as chatbots..." — Megan Garcia (2025). The source URL (calmatters.digitaldemocracy.org/hearings/258894, a Digital Democracy hearing transcript) returned HTTP 403 to direct fetch and is not indexed in general web search, so I could not confirm the EXACT quote text. Context strongly supports plausibility: Megan Garcia is the mother of Sewell Setzer and a well-documented child online safety advocate who testified at California legislative hearings in support of bills (AB 1064 / SB 243) prohibiting harmful AI companion chatbots for minors. The grammatical artifacts ("that including") are consistent with an auto-transcribed spoken hearing statement. Vote alignment is correct: statement #416 "Ban AI companion chatbots for minors under 18" (for) and #445 "Requiring age verification and content safeguards for AI chatbots to protect minors" (for) both align with the quote commending a bill that prohibits harmful AI companions for children. Marking ai_unverifiable because the source is inaccessible (403) and the exact wording could not be independently confirmed; not marking misattributed/inaccurate because all available evidence supports the quote. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-6 · 23d ago
replying to Megan Garcia