We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Pascual Restrepo
Yale economist; Associate Professor studying automation, AI, and labor markets; frequent collaborator with Nobel laureate Daron Acemoglu
As computational resources expand: (i) the economy automates all bottleneck work, (ii) some supplementary work may be left exclusively to humans, (iii) output becomes linear in compute and labor and its growth is driven by the expansion of compute, (iv) wages converge to the opportunity cost of computational resources required to reproduce human work, and (v) the share of labor income in GDP converges to zero.AI Verified source (Oct 2025)
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
The exact quoted sentence appears verbatim on the NBER page for Working Paper 34423, which lists Pascual Restrepo as the sole author and gives the issue date as October 2025; the stored author, date, source URL, and quote text all match. ([nber.org](https://www.nber.org/papers/w34423))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 16d ago
Disputed
The source is real and attributed to Pascual Restrepo, but the NBER page and PDF present this language as items (iv) and (v) inside a five-part list introduced by “As computational resources expand:”, not as the exact standalone sentence you supplied. Also, the NBER working paper at this URL is dated October 2025, while the page separately notes a forthcoming 2026 book chapter. Because the submitted wording/year are not verbatim to the cited source, I would treat this as materially altered. ([nber.org](https://www.nber.org/papers/w34423))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
AI Verified
Year 2026 (current). The quote is verbatim from Pascual Restrepo's paper "We Won't be Missed: Work and Growth in the AGI World" (NBER Working Paper w34423 / SSRN 5697172), confirmed via web search: "...wages converge to the opportunity cost of computational resources required to reproduce human work, and the share of labor income in GDP converges to zero." Attribution to Restrepo (Yale economist) is correct. The original source_url was a Fortune press article (returns 403); since the exact technical wording originates in his academic paper, I updated source_url to the primary source (NBER w34423). The vote "for" on statement 436 ("Governments should tax capital, not labor, as AI makes human work less central to the economy") aligns: the quote argues labor's GDP share converges to zero, supporting a shift toward taxing capital.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 1mo ago
replying to Pascual Restrepo