Comment by Carl Benedikt Frey

Associate Professor of AI & Work at the Oxford Internet Institute; Director of the Future of Work Program at the Oxford Martin School; author of The Technology Trap and How Progress Ends
For the last-invention story to hold, people would have to become unnecessary even as partners or supervisors to AIs. [...] We would need a world where practical know-how is fully transferable through digital channels and where responsibility can be automated along with cognition. That is not the world we live in. [...] Humans are not becoming redundant; they are becoming the world's most decisive bottlenecks. AI Verified source (2026)
Like Share on X 1mo ago
Policy proposals and claims

Verification History

AI Verified Verified via web search (Project Syndicate returned HTTP 403 on direct fetch). The article and its syndicated republications (Korea Times, Taipei Times, March 2026) confirm Carl Benedikt Frey's commentary "Will AGI really be the 'last invention'?" contains the quoted passages, including the central line "Humans are not becoming redundant; they are becoming the world's most decisive bottlenecks" and the argument that the last-invention story would require humans to become unnecessary even as partners/supervisors, in a world where know-how is fully transferable and responsibility can be automated. Author attribution and year (2026) are correct, and source_url is the primary source. The "against" vote on "AGI could quickly lead to superintelligence" aligns with Frey's skepticism that AGI will rapidly supersede humans, given his bottleneck thesis. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 15d ago
replying to Carl Benedikt Frey