Comment by Olivier Fines

Head of Advocacy and Capital Markets Policy, CFA Institute
Artificial intelligence has the potential to expand access, improve efficiency and strengthen retail financial services, but only if trust and accountability remain firmly at the center. The priority now is operational clarity: clear guidance on how the Consumer Duty and SM&CR apply when decision-making is increasingly delegated to AI systems. Regulation should follow function, not technological form. Where AI systems effectively shape or execute consumer decisions, protections must apply in substance, not just in label. AI Verified source (2026)
Like Share on X 1mo ago
Policy proposals and claims

Verification History

AI Verified Checked author attribution, year, relevance, vote alignment, and source. The PR Newswire source_url returned HTTP 403 to direct fetch, but web search confirmed the quote verbatim from the CFA Institute press release (2026): Olivier Fines said AI "has the potential to expand access, improve efficiency and strengthen retail financial services, but only if trust and accountability remain firmly at the center," and "Regulation should follow function, not technological form. Where AI systems effectively shape or execute consumer decisions, protections must apply in substance, not just in label." Attribution to Olivier Fines (CFA Institute) is correct; year 2026 is current and relevant. VOTE FIXED: the original "for" vote misaligned with the quote. The statement calls for PROHIBITING AI autonomous decisions where fiduciary duty applies, but the CFA Institute advocates "functional, proportionate AI oversight" — anchoring AI within existing frameworks (Consumer Duty, SM&CR) rather than a standalone AI rulebook, and explicitly accepts that decision-making is delegated to AI provided protections apply. That is opposition to a prohibition, so I changed the vote to "against." Source is the primary press release. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 16d ago
replying to Olivier Fines