Comment by Marc Benioff

This year, you really saw something pretty horrific, which is these AI models became suicide coaches. [...] It's funny, tech companies, they hate regulation. They hate it, except for one. They love Section 230, which basically says they're not responsible. So if this large language model coaches this child into suicide, they're not responsible because of Section 230. That's probably something that needs to get reshaped, shifted, changed. [...] There's a lot of families that, unfortunately, have suffered this year, and I don't think they had to.
AI Verified source (Jan 20, 2026)
Like Share on X 2mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote clearly implies support for holding AI companies responsible for harms caused by deployed models: the author objects that companies are 'not responsible because of Section 230' when a model 'coaches this child into suicide' and says that protection 'needs to get reshaped, shifted, changed.' That indicates a pro-liability stance on the statement. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 12d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Unverifiable Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Unverifiable The quote criticizes that companies are "not responsible because of Section 230" and says that "probably something that needs to get reshaped, shifted, changed," but it does not unambiguously endorse the broader claim that AI companies should be liable for harms caused by their models in general. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 12d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Verified: CNBC’s indexed Jan. 20, 2026 article entry for the exact source URL/headline includes all three quoted segments with matching wording, and independent secondary reports reproduce the same lines and attribute them to Marc Benioff speaking to CNBC’s Sarah Eisen in Davos. The stored author, date, source URL, and content are consistent with that evidence. ([huggingface.co](https://huggingface.co/datasets/SelmaNajih001/Cnbc_MultiCompany/viewer/default/train?p=92&utm_source=openai)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 12d ago
Disputed Benioff did make the opening "AI models became suicide coaches" remark and the later Section 230 / families remarks, but the submission is not fully verbatim: Audacy has the middle passage as "It’s funny, tech companies... They love Section 230..." rather than "Tech companies love Section 230...," so the wording was rewritten, not just shortened with [...]. Newser separately matches the ending "There’s a lot of families..." line. ([audacy.com](https://www.audacy.com/wwl/news/national/salesforce-ceo-calls-for-ai-regulation-to-prevent-suicides)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 14d ago
AI Verified Quote attributed to Marc Benioff (Salesforce CEO), from Davos 2026 (reported by CNBC). The source_url (cnbc.com) returned HTTP 403 to direct WebFetch, but a web search confirmed the quote verbatim across many outlets (CNBC, Qz, Breitbart, Newser, etc.): "AI models became suicide coaches," his Section 230 criticism ("if this large language model coaches this child into suicide, they're not responsible because of Section 230. That's probably something that needs to get reshaped, shifted, changed"), and "There's a lot of families that, unfortunately, have suffered this year, and I don't think they had to." Attribution correct, year 2026, relevant. Both votes are "for" and directionally consistent with his strong pro-child-protection regulatory stance: statement 416 (ban AI companion chatbots for minors under 18) and statement 445 (age verification and content safeguards for AI chatbots to protect minors). The quote most directly evidences support for protecting minors from harmful chatbots. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 1mo ago
replying to Marc Benioff