We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Anat Lior
Assistant Professor of Law at Drexel University Kline School of Law; AI liability and governance expert
Intentional or reckless is not a common legal standard of care for companies engaging in highly dangerous activities. [...] They are setting the bar very low here. Being able to prove that you did something intentionally that involves AI is going to be very hard.AI Verified source (2026)
1mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history
AI Verified
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly discusses legal liability for AI-related harms and criticizes a rule that would require proving intentional or reckless conduct, saying that standard sets the bar too low and would be hard to prove. That implies support for holding AI companies liable under a broader standard for harms caused by their models.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 4d ago
Vote inference verification history
AI Unverifiable
Vote answer comments
AI Unverifiable
The quote criticizes an "intentional or reckless" standard as "setting the bar very low" and "very hard" to prove, but it does not directly say AI companies should generally be liable for harms caused by deployed models.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 4d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Quote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Fortune’s article at the provided URL, published April 17, 2026, attributes this statement to Anat Lior. In the article text, line 69 contains the first sentence and line 70 contains the remainder, matching the submitted quote; the [...] is a faithful omission, not a substantive alteration. ([fortune.com](https://fortune.com/2026/04/17/illinois-openai-anthropic-ai-catastrophe-liability-bills//))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 6d ago
AI Verified
Quote verified via web search (fortune.com returned HTTP 403 to WebFetch, but search results reproduce the exact wording from the cited 17 Apr 2026 Fortune article — the primary source). Anat Lior (Drexel law professor) is confirmed saying "intentional or reckless is not a common legal standard of care for companies engaging in highly dangerous activities," "They are setting the bar very low here," and "Being able to prove that you did something intentionally that involves AI is going to be very hard." Year 2026 correct. She criticizes the Illinois bill for setting too low a liability bar, implying support for stronger liability — consistent with her "for" vote on "AI companies should be liable for harms caused by their deployed models." Author attribution confirmed.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 26d ago
replying to Anat Lior