We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Anat Lior
Assistant Professor of Law at Drexel University Kline School of Law; AI liability and governance expert
Intentional or reckless is not a common legal standard of care for companies engaging in highly dangerous activities. [...] They are setting the bar very low here. Being able to prove that you did something intentionally that involves AI is going to be very hard.
AI Verified
source
(2026)
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Quote verified via web search (fortune.com returned HTTP 403 to WebFetch, but search results reproduce the exact wording from the cited 17 Apr 2026 Fortune article — the primary source). Anat Lior (Drexel law professor) is confirmed saying "intentional or reckless is not a common legal standard of care for companies engaging in highly dangerous activities," "They are setting the bar very low here," and "Being able to prove that you did something intentionally that involves AI is going to be very hard." Year 2026 correct. She criticizes the Illinois bill for setting too low a liability bar, implying support for stronger liability — consistent with her "for" vote on "AI companies should be liable for harms caused by their deployed models." Author attribution confirmed.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 5d ago
replying to Anat Lior