We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Jennifer Huddleston
Senior fellow, Cato Institute
Establishing a pre-release review or licensing regime for AI companies would grant the government, particularly the executive branch, significant control over AI technologies that could hinder innovation or control expression. [...] Such an approach would open the door to a level of government control that could lead to regulatory capture, restrictions on expression, and the overall weaponization of government power to punish politically disfavored companies.Disputed source (2026)
22d ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
No statement relation verification comments yet.
No vote answer verification comments yet.
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
Disputed
The given Cato page does contain both quoted passages and is dated May 6, 2026, but the article is jointly authored by Juan Londoño and Jennifer Huddleston, not Jennifer Huddleston alone. Also, the stored quote is not verbatim as presented: it places the later sentence (“Establishing a pre-release review...”) before the earlier sentence (“Such an approach would open the door...”), so the ellipsis is being used to reorder text, not just omit intervening words. That makes the stored quote materially altered and misattributed as a single-author quote. ([cato.org](https://www.cato.org/blog/ai-pre-approval-proposal-could-hand-washington-kill-switch-over-speech-innovation))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 19d ago
Disputed
The source URL is a real Cato blog post dated May 6, 2026, and it contains both sentences verbatim; however, they do not appear as one continuous excerpt. The submitted version reverses their order (the “open the door...” sentence appears earlier in the article, while the “pre-release review...” sentence appears later), so it is not a faithful verbatim quotation with simple omissions. The post is also credited jointly to Juan Londoño and Jennifer Huddleston, not to Huddleston alone. ([cato.org](https://www.cato.org/blog/ai-pre-approval-proposal-could-hand-washington-kill-switch-over-speech-innovation))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 21d ago
AI Unverifiable
Source URL (cato.org) returns HTTP 403 and blocks AI fetching, so I could not directly read the page. However, web search returns the exact source_url as the matching result and quotes the identical passage verbatim: "...such an approach would open the door to a level of government control that could lead to regulatory capture, restrictions on expression, and the overall weaponization of government power to punish politically disfavored companies," along with the pre-release review/licensing regime framing. Author attribution (Jennifer Huddleston, Cato Institute senior fellow / tech policy) is correct. The vote ("against" the statement mandating reporting of large AI training runs to a national/international authority) aligns with Huddleston's clearly stated opposition to government oversight/control of AI development. Marking ai_unverifiable strictly because the source_url itself blocks fetching; all other checks (attribution, year, content, vote alignment) pass.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 21d ago
replying to Jennifer Huddleston