Jaron Lanier

As someone deeply invested in the ethics of digital technology, I firmly believe that AI art generators should compensate original artists. These tools often draw from existing works, and it’s crucial to ensure that the creators of those works receive fair recognition and financial compensation. Without protecting artists' rights, we risk devaluing human creativity and undermining the very foundation of art and intellectual property.

I strongly disagree with the use of AI to predict criminal behavior. Such systems risk perpetuating biases, leading to unfair treatment and societal harm. Trusting machines to make these critical judgments undermines human dignity and justice.

I strongly oppose the development of super-persuasive AI aimed at influencing democratic elections. Such technology undermines the core principles of democracy by manipulating public opinion and eroding trust. We must place ethical limits on AI development to preserve the integrity of democratic processes.

I strongly disagree with allowing the development of digital humans with full cognitive abilities. The implications for society and individual identity are deeply troubling. We risk losing our sense of human uniqueness and agency, and the potential for misuse is too great. Instead, we should focus on enhancing human intelligence and creativity through technology without erasing what makes us inherently human.

I firmly believe that the development of emotion-detecting AI should be regulated. These technologies pose significant risks to privacy and human autonomy. Without regulation, they could be misused for manipulation and control, leading to a dystopian future. We must ensure that ethical standards and safeguards are in place to protect individuals from potential abuses.

While the idea of digital representatives might seem innovative, it undermines the human element essential for governance. Politics is about dialogue, empathy, and understanding nuanced contexts, which algorithms cannot fully grasp or replicate.

As a pioneer in the field of technology, I believe AI-generated content should be clearly labeled. Transparency is crucial for maintaining trust in digital media. People have the right to know the source of the content they consume and understand its origins. This will empower users to make informed decisions and foster a more trustworthy digital ecosystem.

As someone who has long been concerned about the ethical implications of technology, I believe that employees at leading AI labs should not contribute to AI progress if it risks destabilizing international politics. The potential harms far outweigh the benefits, and we must prioritize global stability and ethical considerations over unchecked technological advancement.

As someone deeply involved in the development and understanding of technology, I believe it is crucial to prioritize the impact on 'legacy humans'—the individuals and communities who will be affected by AI decisions but aren't part of the tech elite. We must ensure that AI policy-making considers human dignity, employment, and societal values to prevent technology from inadvertently widening social divides.