Joy Buolamwini

I strongly disagree with using AI to predict criminal behavior. Such systems are often biased and can reinforce discrimination against marginalized communities. Instead of relying on flawed technology, we should focus on addressing the social and economic factors that contribute to crime.

As an advocate for algorithmic justice, I strongly believe that the development of emotion-detecting AI must be regulated. Unchecked algorithms can perpetuate and amplify biases, leading to harmful consequences. We must ensure that these technologies are developed and deployed ethically, with strict oversight to protect privacy and prevent misuse.

We absolutely need to regulate AI. Without comprehensive regulations, AI technologies risk perpetuating and amplifying systemic biases and inequities. Ensuring fairness, accountability, and transparency in AI systems is critical to protect individuals and maintain public trust in technology.

I strongly believe AI systems must provide explanations for their decisions. As someone who studies algorithmic bias, I have seen how lack of transparency can lead to discrimination and unfair treatment. Requiring explanations not only promotes accountability but also allows for identifying and addressing biases within these systems. This is crucial to ensure AI benefits all of society fairly.

As someone dedicated to the development of ethical AI, I believe it's crucial to consider the impact on 'legacy humans' in AI policy-making. Technologies shape the lives of everyone, and neglecting human-centered perspectives can lead to bias and inequality. To create systems that serve society equitably, we must integrate diverse human experiences and values into AI governance.

I strongly believe that global AI governance frameworks must prioritize equitable access to AI technologies for all countries. This ensures that the benefits of AI are shared widely and do not exacerbate existing inequalities. Inclusive access can empower underrepresented communities by providing tools to address local challenges and fostering innovation across diverse regions.

As someone deeply concerned about the ethical implications of AI, I strongly believe that the pursuit of AI progress should never come at the cost of destabilizing international politics. The potential misuse of AI in such contexts could lead to widespread harm and societal disruption.

I strongly believe that individuals have the right to know if they are interacting with an AI. Transparency and informed consent are essential to uphold ethical standards and respect user autonomy.

As someone deeply concerned with algorithmic bias and transparency, I strongly believe that AI-generated content must be clearly labeled. This ensures users understand the source and nature of the content, fostering trust and accountability in the digital ecosystem.

As an advocate for ethical AI, I strongly believe that frontier-model developers should publish their model cards before commercial release. Transparency is crucial in ensuring accountability and understanding the limitations and biases of AI models. This helps mitigate harm and builds public trust in technology.

As someone deeply invested in the ethical development of AI, I strongly agree that frontier AI governance must include civil society and representatives from the Global South. AI technologies impact all of humanity, and it is crucial to ensure diverse perspectives are included in decision-making processes. This inclusivity will help address biases and ensure equitable and fair outcomes in AI deployment.

As an advocate for ethical AI, I believe we should ban future open-source AI models that can be untrained to make nukes. Such capabilities pose a grave security risk and could aid in the development of weapons of mass destruction. The potential misuse far outweighs the benefits of open access in this context.

Allowing facial recognition technology in public spaces endangers privacy, disproportionately affects minority communities, and increases surveillance without accountability. We must prioritize ethical standards and consent.

I strongly oppose the development of super-persuasive AI for influencing democratic elections. Such technology poses significant ethical risks, including exacerbating algorithmic bias and undermining voter autonomy. Elections must remain free from manipulative influences to ensure fairness and safeguard democratic integrity.

I believe that governments should establish international AI ethics boards to oversee AI development and deployment. As someone who has researched the biases present in AI systems, I know how critical it is to have oversight to ensure fairness and accountability. Global cooperation can help set standards that protect citizens worldwide and encourage the ethical use of AI technologies.