Timnit Gebru

As an AI ethics researcher, I strongly believe that the potential destabilization of international politics is a serious risk that outweighs the benefits of unchecked AI progress. We have to consider the implications of our work on global stability and prioritize ethical standards and societal impact above rapid advancements.

I strongly disagree with the idea that the first lab to build Artificial Superintelligence should prevent others from developing competing ASIs. Concentrating such immense power in one entity poses a significant risk to ethical standards, diversity of thought, and global governance. A pluralistic approach to ASI development encourages collaboration, transparency, and accountability, which is vital for ensuring these technologies benefit all of humanity.

As someone deeply involved in AI ethics, I firmly believe AI labs should pause training if AI Safety Institutes detect signs of losing control. Ensuring public safety and ethical standards must be our top priority. Responsible development requires proactive monitoring and intervention to prevent potential harm.

I strongly disagree with companies being allowed to develop super-persuasive AI that can influence democratic elections. Such technology poses a threat to the very foundation of democracy. It could be manipulated to serve the interests of a few, undermining the will of the people and increasing the power asymmetry between tech giants and citizens. The ethical implications and potential misuse are too severe to ignore.

As someone deeply concerned about the ethical implications of AI, I strongly believe that big AI companies should allocate at least a third of their compute resources to AI safety. Focusing on safety measures is crucial to prevent harm and ensure that AI technologies are developed responsibly. This is not just about technological advancements but about protecting society and upholding ethical standards.

I believe that liberalism may struggle to keep pace with AI superintelligence developments. The potential for misuse and control of AI by powerful entities could challenge the principles of liberalism and lead to societal inequalities.

I believe that AI has the potential to cause a concentration of power because it is currently being developed and deployed by a few large tech companies. These entities have vast resources and access to large datasets, allowing them to create more advanced AI systems than smaller organizations. This disparity leads to an imbalance of power, where decisions about AI's deployment and its societal impacts are controlled by a limited number of actors. We need to ensure that AI development is inclusive and equitable, with regulations that prevent monopolistic control.

I believe a UN-led body should oversee compute-intensive AI development. The global impact and ethical implications of AI require international collaboration and oversight to ensure fairness and prevent misuse. Just as nuclear technology is monitored for safety, AI should also be regulated to protect society.

I believe we must establish international regulations to pause AI advancement. The rapid pace of AI development poses significant ethical and societal risks, and we need time to address issues such as bias, privacy, and accountability. Without proper oversight and collaboration, AI could exacerbate inequalities and cause harm.