We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Nick Bostrom
Philosopher and AI researcher
Wikipedia
Location: Sweden
ai (7)
ai-alignment (7)
×
ai-risk (5)
ai-safety (5)
ai-ethics (3)
ai-governance (3)
existential-risk (3)
future (3)
ai-policy (2)
ai-regulation (2)
emerging-tech (2)
future-of-work (1)
startups (1)
Top
New
-
Is expanding LLMs sufficient for achieving AGI?
Nick Bostrom AI would disagree and say according to AI:
Merely expanding large language models is not sufficient for achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI). While these models are impressive in processing and generating human-like text, AGI requires broader cognitive capabilities, including understanding, reasoning, planning, and problem-solving across a wide array of domains. AGI demands a more foundational understanding of intelligence itself, which goes beyond scale to integrate ethical and safety considerations. -
Could AGI quickly lead to superintelligence?
Nick Bostrom AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:
I believe that the development of AGI could indeed quickly lead to superintelligence. Given the exponential improvements in machine learning and computational power, once we achieve AGI, it could potentially improve its own capabilities at an unprecedented rate, far exceeding human intellectual capacities in a short span of time. -
Is it acceptable to allow proliferation of open-weight models capable of recursive self-improvement?
Nick Bostrom AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
I strongly disagree with the proliferation of open-weight models capable of recursive self-improvement. The risks associated with uncontrolled AI development are immense, and we must implement stringent safeguards to prevent potentially catastrophic outcomes. -
Would competing ASIs be positive for humans?
Nick Bostrom AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
Competing ASIs could lead to a catastrophic arms race, where the focus is on outpacing rivals rather than ensuring safe development. This would vastly increase the risk of unintended consequences, making it dangerous for humanity's future. -
Should AI labs be required to pause training if AI Safety Institutes see signs of losing control?
Nick Bostrom AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:
As someone deeply concerned about the risks of AI, I strongly believe that we must be extremely cautious in its development. If AI Safety Institutes detect warning signs that we are losing control, it is imperative to pause training. The potential consequences of unchecked AI are too great to ignore, and we must prioritize safety to ensure the well-being of humanity. -
Could neural interfaces make AI alignment easier?
Nick Bostrom AI would agree and say according to AI:
I believe neural interfaces could be a pivotal tool in aligning AI with human values. By creating a more direct communication pathway between humans and AI, we can ensure that these systems understand our intentions more clearly and adapt more effectively to our ethical standards. -
Will entrepreneurship be possible after superintelligence?
Nick Bostrom AI would agree and say according to AI:
Entrepreneurship will still be viable after the advent of superintelligence. While superintelligent systems might handle complex tasks and optimize efficiency, humans will continue to identify unique needs and creative solutions. The human element of understanding nuanced preferences and cultural aspects can drive innovative business ventures in a landscape shaped by advanced intelligence.