We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Alan Daitch
Argentine technology law specialist
At bottom, there is always a natural or legal person who answers for it, even if the administration is automated. [...] The law requires that the shareholders of any company be persons. Someone puts up capital and someone is responsible if something goes wrong. There is no ownership registry for AI companies, nor is AI a subject of law.AI Verified source (Jun 4, 2026)
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote qualifies. In the article, Daitch is responding to the government's proposal to grant 'personalidad jurídica a agentes de IA' as 'non-human corporation,' and his quoted reasoning says companies must ultimately have human/legal-person owners and responsible parties, adding that 'la IA no es un sujeto de derecho.' That clearly establishes opposition to granting AI agents legal personhood as non-human corporations. ([infobae.com](https://www.infobae.com/tecno/2026/06/04/un-especialista-en-derecho-tecnologico-explico-por-que-el-proyecto-de-milei-sobre-inteligencia-artificial-no-cierra-legalmente/?outputType=amp-type))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 2h ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The author is opposing the idea. In the source, the article frames the debate as Milei’s proposal to give AI agents legal personality as a “non-human corporation,” and Daitch says the law requires company shareholders to be persons, that someone human or legal must always be responsible, and that AI “is not a subject of law,” which strongly implies rejection of legal personhood for AI agents. ([infobae.com](https://www.infobae.com/tecno/2026/06/04/un-especialista-en-derecho-tecnologico-explico-por-que-el-proyecto-de-milei-sobre-inteligencia-artificial-no-cierra-legalmente/?outputType=amp-type))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 2h ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Infobae’s article dated 2026-06-04 attributes the Spanish original to Alan Daitch and includes the three relevant statements—one earlier and two later in the piece—which match the submitted English text as a faithful translation with an allowed omission between excerpts. The supplied Infobae URL does contain the quote, and the stored author and date are consistent with the article. ([infobae.com](https://www.infobae.com/tecno/2026/06/04/un-especialista-en-derecho-tecnologico-explico-por-que-el-proyecto-de-milei-sobre-inteligencia-artificial-no-cierra-legalmente/?outputType=amp-type))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 2h ago
replying to Alan Daitch