Comment by Peter Miller

I think it’s lacking some important details, doesn’t attempt to quantify the odds, and doesn’t clarify the Covid origins debate. In this post, I will explain the points in contention, put some odds on different Covid origins scenarios, and show why we can reject Bloom’s preferred Covid origins theory with a high degree of confidence. [...] To put numbers on this question, we have to build epidemic models. These models simulate a wide variety of epidemics, with different starting points, and then calculate the odds that each will look the epidemic we actually observed.
AI Verified source (Feb 4, 2026)
Like Share on X 1h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified The Medium article at the supplied URL is fetchable and shows author "Peter Miller" and publication date "Feb 4, 2026." The first quoted passage appears verbatim in the opening paragraphs ("I think it’s lacking some important details..." and "In this post, I will explain...") and the later quoted passage also appears verbatim in the section on epidemic models ("To put numbers on this question, we have to build epidemic models..."). The ellipsis represents omitted intervening text, so the stored quote is authentic, correctly attributed, and the stored date/source are consistent with the page. ([medium.com](https://medium.com/%40tgof137/contra-bloom-on-covid-phylogeny-cc01115ba0f2)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 1h ago
replying to Peter Miller