We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Nicholas Wade
Science writer; former New York Times science editor
But it seems to me that proponents of lab escape can explain all the available facts about SARS2 considerably more easily than can those who favor natural emergence.AI Verified (May 5, 2021)
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote is directly about the complete origin question and explicitly contrasts lab escape with natural emergence, saying the lab-escape account explains the facts better. In the article’s framing, those are the two competing theories for how COVID-19 originated, so the author’s stance on the full statement is readily determinable. ([thebulletin.org](https://thebulletin.org/2021/05/the-origin-of-covid-did-people-or-nature-open-pandoras-box-at-wuhan/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 1h ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The author is ultimately supportive of the lab-origin statement: he says the evidence "leans more strongly in one direction" and that lab-escape proponents explain "all the available facts" more easily than natural-emergence proponents, while adding that this is still an inference short of definitive proof. ([thebulletin.org](https://thebulletin.org/2021/05/the-origin-of-covid-did-people-or-nature-open-pandoras-box-at-wuhan/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 1h ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
The source URL is fetchable and shows the article “The origin of COVID: Did people or nature open Pandora’s box at Wuhan?” by Nicholas Wade, dated May 5, 2021. The submitted sentence appears verbatim in the article body, so the quote is authentic, verbatim, and correctly attributed. ([thebulletin.org](https://thebulletin.org/2021/05/the-origin-of-covid-did-people-or-nature-open-pandoras-box-at-wuhan/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 1h ago
replying to Nicholas Wade