Comment by Ll4v3s

But the problems of selectively paying attention to the evidence you want to see isn't a unique problem of bayesian reasoning. That's possible for literally any style of putatively rational thinking. All else equal, I would think the explicit nature of the faulty Bayesian's thought process would highlight the flawed reasoning rather than hiding it. Even if you don't do explicit credence calculations (which may often be impractical), there are super useful reasoning heuristics that come from bayesian reasoning.