We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Born-Requirement2128
Reddit commenter on priors and COVID-19 origins
I suppose you could base the priors on geographical proximity. If from a lab, the virus had to travel zero miles to get to the city with the outbreak, if a natural virus, it had to travel 1000 miles without causing any infections along the way. The zero mile journey is clearly far more likely than the thousand mile one.AI Verified (Apr 4, 2026)
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote explicitly discusses how to set priors and compare likelihoods for lab-origin versus natural-origin hypotheses, which is core Bayesian reasoning about the COVID-19 origins question. In context, it appears as a reply in a subthread debating whether such reasoning is the right way to approach the issue, so it provides enough signal to infer a stance on the complete statement. ([reddit.com](https://www.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/1ahdisp/comment/oebnis9/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 1h ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote is best read as supporting the statement: the author answers a complaint about “bad Bayesian reasoning” by proposing how to set priors—“base the priors on geographical proximity” and compare the likelihood of a “zero mile” versus “thousand mile” journey—so they are endorsing Bayesian-style analysis as an appropriate way to judge COVID origins. The inference to “the right framework for settling” is somewhat stronger than the quote itself, but support is more likely than opposition or neutrality in this context. ([reddit.com](https://www.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/1ahdisp/comment/oebnis9/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 1h ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
The supplied Reddit permalink shows a comment by Born-Requirement2128 containing the quoted text verbatim aside from line-break formatting, under the thread “Most experts believe COVID-19 was probably not a lab leak — LessWrong.” The source URL therefore contains the quote and supports the attribution. The fetched page shows only a relative timestamp (“3mo ago”), so the exact day is not independently exposed there, but nothing in the source contradicts the stored date. ([reddit.com](https://www.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/1ahdisp/comment/oebnis9/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 1h ago
replying to Born-Requirement2128