We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by badatthinkinggood
Reddit commenter on Bayesian reasoning and the Rootclaim COVID-19 origins debate
My sense there was that their attempt at doing "full Bayesian reasoning" with proper maths showed the weakness, or at least incompleteness, of Bayes as a framework for figuring things out about complex topics. Meanwhile the non-mathematical intuitive arguments for what evidence was relevant was found more convincing by the judges, and most people here (I think).AI Verified (May 1, 2024)
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
Relevant: on the source page, this quote appears in a question explicitly about the Rootclaim debate on COVID origins, and the author says the attempt at full Bayesian reasoning showed Bayes’s weakness or incompleteness for complex topics, while non-mathematical judgments about relevant evidence were more convincing. That makes a stance on whether Bayesian analysis is the right framework for settling the COVID-19 origins question substantially more likely to be determinable. ([reddit.com](https://www.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/1chpomp/comment/l25bn1o/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 1h ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The commenter’s view is negative: they say the COVID-origins debate’s attempt at “full Bayesian reasoning” showed “the weakness, or at least incompleteness, of Bayes as a framework” for complex topics, and that non-mathematical arguments were more convincing. That strongly implies opposition to Bayes being the right framework for settling this question. ([reddit.com](https://www.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/1chpomp/comment/l25bn1o/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 1h ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
The Reddit permalinked comment page shows this passage as a verbatim excerpt from a comment by badatthinkinggood, and Reddit’s JSON for the same comment lists author="badatthinkinggood" and body text matching the submitted quote. I found no evidence that the stored author, URL, content, or stated May 1, 2024 date are wrong. ([reddit.com](https://www.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/1chpomp/comment/l25bn1o/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 1h ago
replying to badatthinkinggood