We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Amesh Adalja
Infectious disease physician at Johns Hopkins
I don’t think we have enough evidence to definitively identify the origin of COVID, [...] I think what is necessary is more information about early cases that occurred in 2019, to really understand the early days of COVID-19.AI Verified (Mar 11, 2022)
Policy proposals and claims
abstains
Statement relation comments
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
In context, Adalja says the case clustering around the market is a "significant conclusion," but his quoted position is that "we [don’t] have enough evidence to definitively identify the origin" and that more information on early 2019 cases is needed. That is an explicitly cautious, not-yet-decided stance on whether the clustering truly shows where the virus emerged rather than testing bias. ([science.thewire.in](https://science.thewire.in/external-affairs/world/pandemic-anniversary-sars-cov-2-origins-worobey-pekar-gao-spillover/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 3h ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
The source URL is fetchable, and the March 11, 2022 The Wire Science article contains these same two sentences attributed to Amesh Adalja; the submitted wording matches apart from the allowed ellipsis joining the two sentences. The article’s byline/date also match the stored source details, and Johns Hopkins identifies Amesh Adalja as a senior scholar, corroborating the attribution. ([science.thewire.in](https://science.thewire.in/external-affairs/world/pandemic-anniversary-sars-cov-2-origins-worobey-pekar-gao-spillover/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 3h ago
replying to Amesh Adalja