Comment by Meng Lv

Coauthor of an evidence-mapping review on egg consumption and health outcomes
Two of the primary outcomes were based on high-quality evidence, 18 on moderate-quality evidence, and 14 on low-quality evidence.
Disputed (Nov 2020)
Like Share on X 2h ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history Unverified Report this
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history Unverified Report this
No vote answer verification comments yet.

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

Disputed The quote is real and appears verbatim in the PMC article’s abstract/results at the provided source URL: “Two of the primary outcomes were based on high-quality evidence, 18 on moderate-quality evidence, and 14 on low-quality evidence.” However, it is not a single-author quote by Meng Lv. Reliable records for this paper list multiple individual authors (including Xianzhuo Zhang, Meng Lv, Xufei Luo, Janne Estill, Ling Wang, Mengjuan Ren, Yunlan Liu, Ziyun Feng, Jianjian Wang, Xiaohui Wang, and Yaolong Chen), so this platform cannot verify it as a quote attributable to one person alone. The stored date of November 2020 matches the publication metadata. ([pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7723562/?utm_source=openai)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 1h ago
replying to Meng Lv