YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Nathan Young

Human avatar
LessWrong commenter on Bayesianism and epistemic methods
Solid article. Defines terms in ways I agree with. Raised objections I hadn’t thought of. Thought provoking. On the object level the criticisms of bayesianism seem solid, but I am unsure if the replacement is good.
AI Verified (Dec 23, 2025)
Source:
Nathan Young, review/comment on Richard Ngo, "Why I'm not a Bayesian," LessWrong, January 2026.
Like Share on X 21h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified The quote is authentic: it appears on the submitted LessWrong URL as a Nathan Young “Review for 2024 Review,” with the quoted text matching there, and the GreaterWrong mirror gives the exact timestamp 23 Dec 2025 15:55 UTC. That supports the stored author, content, source URL, and date as correct. ([lesswrong.com](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/TyusAoBMjYzGN3eZS/why-i-m-not-a-bayesian)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 21h ago
replying to Nathan Young