We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by COVID's origins: what we do and don't know
Nature Comment article on COVID-19 origins published February 24, 2026.
In the 78-page document, we determined that most of the peer-reviewed scientific evidence supports the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 has a zoonotic origin, meaning that it came from an animal. But until requests for additional information are met or more data become available, there can be no certainty about when, where and how SARS-CoV-2 entered the human population.AI Verified (Feb 24, 2026)
20d ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote says the peer-reviewed evidence supports a zoonotic origin, which directly opposes the lab-leak statement.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 15d ago
No vote answer verification comments yet.
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Nature's comment contains the stored sentence; author corrected from individual coauthors to the article title.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 15d ago
Disputed
The quoted text appears verbatim on the UNMC page published 2026-02-25 and is excerpted from the Nature article "COVID’s origins: what we do and don’t know" dated 2026-02-24. However, Nature presents that piece as a multi-author article with 23 named individual authors; Stuart D. Blacksell is listed as one coauthor, not as the sole speaker. Per the single-author verification rule, this quote must be treated as disputed rather than verified as a Stuart D. Blacksell quote.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 20d ago
replying to COVID's origins: what we do and don't know