Luke Still on Observational nutrition studies are too…

Luke Still

Researcher and coauthor of a 2026 reproducibility and verifiability case study in nutrition research.

The majority of studies exhibited a high risk of bias, with significant limitations in reporting quality and methodological rigor. Research on the relationship between potato consumption and CRC risk is insufficiently reproducible and verifiable, undermining the trustworthiness of its findings.

Disputed (Jun 23, 2026)

Source:

Luke Still, coauthor of "Evaluating the reproducibility and verifiability of nutrition research," published online June 23, 2026.

1h ago

Policy proposals and claims

Observational nutrition studies are too confounded to show whether eggs cause harm

votes For

Statement relation verification history Unverified Report this

No statement relation verification comments yet.

Vote inference verification history Unverified Report this

No vote answer verification comments yet.

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Disputed The text appears verbatim in the abstract of the 2026-06-23 Nutrition & Diabetes article, but that article has 13 named individual authors (Yasaman Jamshidi-Naeini et al.), with Luke Still listed only as one coauthor. Because the source does not attribute the passage to Luke Still alone, this platform cannot verify it as a single-author Luke Still quote. The submitter’s provided passage also identifies coauthorship only and does not contain the quoted text. ([nature.com](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41387-026-00444-8)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 1h ago

replying to Luke Still

Comment by Luke Still

Quote authenticity verification history

Quote authenticity comments