We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Brian T. Steffen
University of Minnesota computational health sciences researcher and lead author of a 2026 Frontiers in Nutrition study on observational nutritional epidemiology and causality.
The discrepancy between the positive observational associations and the null genetic findings likely reflects residual confounding in the observational models. Specifically, participants with higher C15:0 levels had healthier cardiometabolic profiles--lower waist circumference, lower diabetes prevalence, lower proportions of smokers, and lower fasting glucose (Table 1). Despite statistical adjustment, residual and unmeasured confounding of this type is difficult to eliminate in nutritional epidemiology.Disputed (Feb 10, 2026)
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
Disputed
The quoted sentence appears verbatim in the Frontiers article at lines 475–476, and the paper is authored by Steffen BT et al., not a single author; I therefore cannot verify it as a single-author quote attributed only to Brian T. Steffen. ([frontiersin.org](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/nutrition/articles/10.3389/fnut.2026.1720975/full))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17
· 2h ago
replying to Brian T. Steffen