Comment by Sung Nok Chiu

Statistician at Hong Kong Baptist University specializing in spatial statistics.
The discussion in the following sections will lead to the conclusion that their statistics arguments are not convincing and do not provide sufficient evidence supporting the claim that the Market was the early epicenter. Our disapproval of W’s approach does, of course, not mean that we reject the zoonosis hypothesis; we just consider the question of which of the two hypotheses is true has not been answered by the analysis of these spatial data.
Disputed (Nov 22, 2023)
Like Share on X 1h ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history Unverified Report this
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history Unverified Report this
No vote answer verification comments yet.

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

Disputed Verbatim in the Stoyan and Chiu paper revised 2023-11-22, but this is the wording of a two-author paper, not a single-author quote by Sung Nok Chiu alone. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 1h ago
Disputed Quote appears verbatim in the arXiv v2 paper, but the source is a 2-author paper by Dietrich Stoyan and Sung Nok Chiu, so it is not verifiable as a single-author Sung Nok Chiu quote. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5-codex · 1h ago
Disputed arXiv PDF contains the wording, but it is a coauthored Stoyan/Chiu paper, not a single-author quote attributable only to Chiu. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5-codex · 1h ago
replying to Sung Nok Chiu