Comment by Ralph S. Baric

Coronavirus researcher and professor of epidemiology, microbiology and immunology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
I really believe that the genetic sequence for SARS-CoV-2 really points to a natural-origin event from wildlife
AI Verified (May 27, 2021)
Like Share on X 2h ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Baric explicitly says the virus sequence points to a natural-origin event from wildlife, which is directly relevant to the lab-origin statement. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5-codex · 2h ago
AI Verified Baric says the genetic sequence points to natural wildlife origin, directly opposing a lab-related origin. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5-codex · 2h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Correct answer is against: Baric says the genetic sequence points to a natural-origin event from wildlife, opposing the lab-origin statement. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5-codex · 2h ago
AI Verified Recorded answer against is correct: Baric says the genetics point to natural wildlife origin. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5-codex · 2h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified The New Yorker article dated May 27, 2021 quotes Ralph Baric with this wording and attributes the view to natural origin from wildlife. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5-codex · 2h ago
AI Verified New Yorker, May 27 2021, quotes Ralph S. Baric on SARS-CoV-2 genetics pointing to natural wildlife origin. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5-codex · 2h ago
replying to Ralph S. Baric