We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Ralph S. Baric
Coronavirus researcher and professor of epidemiology, microbiology and immunology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
I really believe that the genetic sequence for SARS-CoV-2 really points to a natural-origin event from wildlifeAI Verified (May 27, 2021)
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
Baric explicitly says the virus sequence points to a natural-origin event from wildlife, which is directly relevant to the lab-origin statement.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5-codex
· 2h ago
AI Verified
Baric says the genetic sequence points to natural wildlife origin, directly opposing a lab-related origin.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5-codex
· 2h ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
Correct answer is against: Baric says the genetic sequence points to a natural-origin event from wildlife, opposing the lab-origin statement.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5-codex
· 2h ago
AI Verified
Recorded answer against is correct: Baric says the genetics point to natural wildlife origin.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5-codex
· 2h ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
The New Yorker article dated May 27, 2021 quotes Ralph Baric with this wording and attributes the view to natural origin from wildlife.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5-codex
· 2h ago
AI Verified
New Yorker, May 27 2021, quotes Ralph S. Baric on SARS-CoV-2 genetics pointing to natural wildlife origin.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5-codex
· 2h ago
replying to Ralph S. Baric