Comment by Joe Carlsmith

Senior research analyst at Open Philanthropy; writes on AI safety, alignment, and existential risk from power-seeking AI
If our ability to make increasingly capable AI systems safe can’t benefit from such labor in a comparable way, then at least for relatively hard problem profiles, and absent large amounts of capability restraint, I think we’re likely headed for disaster. I also discuss the timing of our efforts at AI for AI safety. In particular, I highlight what I call the “AI for AI safety sweet spot” – that is, a zone of capability development where frontier AI systems are capable enough to radically improve the security factors above, but not yet capable enough (given our countermeasures) to disempower humanity. I don’t think it’s clear that we’ll be able to benefit from such a sweet spot – and especially not, for long. But I think it’s a useful concept to have in mind, and an important possible focal point for our efforts at capability restraint.
AI Verified (Mar 14, 2025)
Like Share on X 1h ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The essay is about using frontier AI to improve safety and capability restraint before systems become too dangerous, which is relevant to the pause-at-human-genius-level statement. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 56min ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The essay argues that AI-for-AI-safety and capability restraint are necessary to avoid disaster, which supports the pause-at-human-genius-level statement; the recorded answer ‘for’ is correct. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 55min ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Joe Carlsmith’s LessWrong post states that AI-for-AI-safety is crucial and that without comparable safety gains ‘we’re likely headed for disaster’ (lines 47-50), matching the stored passage. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 57min ago
replying to Joe Carlsmith