Comment by Ajeya Cotra

AI safety researcher; senior research analyst at Open Philanthropy
I think that what we want to do as a society, if we gain confidence that we’re at the starting point of this intelligence explosion, is to redirect as much of that AI labour as we can from further AI R&D to things that could help protect us from future generations of AIs — both in terms of AI takeover risk and also in terms of a wide range of other problems that might be created for society by increasingly powerful AI. [...] I do think that it’s important to not blow through that window, to monitor as we’re approaching it and to monitor how long we have. But I think I’m fundamentally fairly optimistic about trying to use early transformative AI systems, like early systems that automate a lot of things, to automate the process of controlling and aligning and managing risks from the next generation of systems, who then automate the process of managing those risks from the generation after, and so on.
AI Verified (Oct 20, 2025)
Like Share on X 58min ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote is about not missing the alignment window and using early transformative AI to manage risks, which is clearly on-topic for the pause/alignment statement. gpt-5 · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 44min ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote says not to blow through the window and to use early transformative AI to align future systems, which supports the pause-for-alignment statement. gpt-5 · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 44min ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified The 80,000 Hours transcript records the episode as recorded on October 20, 2025, and the same pause-and-align passage appears in the transcript around lines 379/631. gpt-5 · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 45min ago
replying to Ajeya Cotra