Comment by Jacob Charnock

Third-party evaluations for frontier AI have mostly tested models through external interfaces before deployment. But the risks from frontier AI models depend on how their developers use and govern them internally. Recently, CEOs of frontier AI companies have committed to hosting embedded assessments. These assessments would give independent evaluators employee-like access to a developer's internal systems, staff, and documentation. First, we argue that this can enable deeper and more flexible assessments of risks that depend on internal systems and practices, while providing access under stronger security controls. Then, we examine seven design questions about scope, information gathering, duration, timing, terms of engagement, disclosure, and escalation. We recommend that frontier AI developers begin hosting embedded assessments now, covering at least three areas central to managing risks from internal AI use: internal agent monitoring, internal agent security controls and permissions, and model alignment.
Disputed (Sep 21, 2026)
Like Share on X 55min ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes For
Statement relation verification history Unverified Report this
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history Unverified Report this
No vote answer verification comments yet.

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

Disputed arXiv confirms the exact wording but lists eight coauthors. This multi-author paper cannot be verified as a single-author quote by Jacob Charnock. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 1min ago
replying to Jacob Charnock

Other authors to follow