We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Yoshua Bengio
AI Pioneer, Turing Award winner
In order to reduce the probability of someone intentionally or unintentionally bringing about a rogue AI, we need to increase governance and we should consider limiting access to the large-scale generalist AI systems that could be weaponized, which would mean that the code and neural net parameters would not be shared in open-source and some of the important engineering tricks to make them work would not be shared either. Ideally this would stay in the hands of neutral international organizations (think of a combination of IAEA and CERN for AI) that develop safe and beneficial AI systems that could also help us fight rogue AIs.Verified source
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote explicitly proposes keeping powerful AI in the hands of 'neutral international organizations' and even says 'think of a combination of IAEA and CERN for AI,' which directly supports creating a global AI institution modeled on CERN.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote explicitly endorses AI being kept in the hands of "neutral international organizations" and says to "think of a combination of IAEA and CERN for AI," which clearly supports creating a CERN-like global AI institute.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Verified: Bengio’s official blog post “FAQ on Catastrophic AI Risks,” published June 24, 2023, is attributed to Yoshua Bengio, and lines 187–188 contain the quoted passage verbatim as two consecutive sentences. The provided source URL redirects to the current official page. ([yoshuabengio.org](https://yoshuabengio.org/2023/06/24/faq-on-catastrophic-ai-risks/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
replying to Yoshua Bengio